The announcement of the fifty fifth Kerala State Movie Awards held in Thrissur has now turned controversial. When Fisheries and Tradition Minister Saji Cherian introduced the winners, the Greatest Lyricist award for Manjummel Boys shocked everybody. The award went to well-liked rapper and lyricist Vedan (actual title Hirandhas Murali). As quickly as his title was introduced, criticism and questions rained down on social media.
Public outrage and social media backlash
The choice to award Vedan has deeply affected followers and social activists. Many have questioned whether or not the federal government is true to honor somebody who has been accused of a criminal offense. Harsh feedback had been extensively posted on X (Twitter), asking, “What message does giving him an award whereas legal circumstances are pending ship to society?” Some individuals stated underneath the hashtag #KeralaStateFilmAwards, “Honoring a person when the allegations towards him are unproven calls into query the credibility of the federal government.”
Comparisons and questions of double requirements
Some netizens alleged, “Movies like #Kammarasambhavam had been boycotted for political causes, however how did they select somebody who was embroiled in allegations?” Questions like, “Why are feminist activists silent?” additionally gained momentum. Some additionally questioned, “Is Vethan actually worthy of being an incredible lyricist?” The concept “some gifted new writers missed out on this chance” additionally unfold.
Ongoing allegations gasoline the controversy
The controversy surrounding Vedan created a stir final 12 months, with a number of ladies making sexual allegations towards him. Though Vedan has publicly apologized, the circumstances are nonetheless pending in court docket. The truth that he was awarded the state award on this context has challenged the credibility of the federal government and the award committee. Though there’s an argument that “an individual shouldn’t be thought of responsible except an accusation is confirmed,” most social media customers condemn this as “setting a fallacious precedent for society.”Disclaimer: The knowledge relating to sexual allegations is predicated on out there experiences and shouldn’t be thought of a press release of guilt except confirmed by a court docket of regulation. All individuals talked about shall be presumed harmless till due technique of regulation establishes in any other case.