Girija Oak Godbole has lastly addressed the comparisons being drawn between her and Hollywood stars Sydney Sweeney and Monica Bellucci after she discovered herself on the centre of sudden on-line consideration. The Marathi actor, who went viral after clips of her interview—the place she appeared in a blue sari—circulated broadly, has spoken about how admiration rapidly slid into objectification.In a current dialog with Hauterrfly, Girija mirrored on how the web’s gaze typically reduces girls to their our bodies, whether or not they’re Indian actors or international stars.
‘That’s all folks discuss’
Reacting to being likened to Sydney Sweeney and Monica Bellucci, Girija identified how such comparisons are hardly ever about expertise or physique of labor. “That’s all folks discuss,” she stated, referring to how conversations round actresses typically centre on their our bodies.She cited an instance involving Sydney Sweeney to clarify how deliberate the gaze will be. “I noticed a video the place she was speaking about one thing else, however the subtitles have been positioned on both facet of her breasts—so when you learn, you’re additionally trying. And other people praised the alignment, saying the particular person deserves 100 marks. That’s the gaze.”Whereas Girija acknowledged that some celebrities could consciously lean into such consideration, she pressured that the core problem lies elsewhere. “If that’s her selection, then it’s high quality. The issue is folks don’t perceive company. They don’t perceive a girl’s selection,” she stated, underlining the distinction between self-expression and compelled objectification.
Fame and its darker facet
The comparisons emerged alongside Girija being dubbed the “nationwide crush,” a label that adopted her sudden viral reputation. Nonetheless, the eye additionally introduced with it disturbing penalties, together with morphed and AI-generated nude pictures and unsettling direct messages.“Lots of people despatched me pictures and movies—AI-generated. It’s absurd,” she stated, explaining how the pictures have been clearly manipulated however nonetheless deeply invasive. “In these pictures, my garments are lacking, however my physique language is similar. Similar sofa, similar setting. It appears weird.”
‘Selection is the important thing distinction’
Girija additionally addressed arguments made by some customers who tried to justify such edits by pointing to intimate scenes carried out by actors on display screen. “I used to be instructed in feedback and DMs—once you do kissing scenes, once you put on much less garments since you’re an actor, you don’t have an issue. Then why now?” she revealed. Calling out the entitlement behind such logic, she stated, “You see the entitlement? The lack of knowledge of selection? Whether or not I need to do a scene or not—that’s my selection. That could be very totally different out of your AI-generated model.”