Malayalam actor Unni Mukundan, recognized for his function in Marco, is dealing with authorized bother after the Kakkanad Judicial First Class Justice of the Peace Courtroom summoned him to look in court docket on 27 October concerning an assault case filed by his former PR supervisor, Vipin Kumar.
Police file chargesheet in case
The summons follows a police investigation that collected substantial proof, together with roughly 10 minutes of CCTV footage, witness statements, circumstantial proof, and cellular tower location knowledge. Beforehand, some media retailers had falsely claimed that there was no proof of the assault or CCTV footage. Nonetheless, the police investigation substantiated the criticism with clear proof.
The cost sheet was filed below sections 115(2), 126(2), 296(B), 351(2), and 324(4), pertaining to offenses together with getting into the sufferer’s flat advanced with intent to trigger hurt, premeditated assault, verbal abuse, issuing life threats, and damaging property (particularly throwing and destroying the sufferer’s sun shades).
The fees are bailable, and Unni is anticipated to use for bail as a part of a routine authorized process.
Unni Mukundan denied assault fees
Earlier, in response to Vipin’s criticism, Unni held a press convention, claiming he didn’t hurt Vipin and stating he would stop appearing if confirmed in any other case. He additionally alleged that Vipin was not his supervisor. In a press convention held in Kochi, Unni clarified that there was no bodily assault and that the dispute had been misrepresented.
“This isn’t a case of assault. There was no bodily violence,” the actor stated in Could this 12 months, including, “As a pal, I solely needed to confront Vipin about why he was talking negatively about me. Through the heated alternate, I did throw his sun shades — that’s true. However there was no bodily contact.”
The problem was addressed by Movie Workers Federation of Kerala (FEFKA) and Affiliation of Malayalam Film Artists (AMMA), who held a joint dialogue with each events. Based mostly on the proof introduced by Vipin, Unni’s press convention claims have been discovered to be factually incorrect.
FEFKA Basic Secretary B Unnikrishnan and AMMA office-bearers clarified this in a press convention, stating that they might not intervene within the police criticism filed by Vipin and that the case ought to proceed in accordance with authorized procedures.