As Salman Khan turned 60 on Saturday, he has been summoned by The Kota District Client Disputes Redressal Fee to be current within the court docket in individual on January 20 with related paperwork . The court docket has additionally ordered a forensic examination of the actor’s signature as regards to a pan masala commercial As per the report in Mid-day the summon is a results of a petition filed on the Kota Client Court docket in opposition to Salman Khan and Rajshree Pan Masala Firm, alleging deceptive promoting practices. The grievance claims that the commercial promotes saffron infused cardamom which is fake as saffron can’t realistically be included in a low-cost pan masala pouch. The petition additionally claims that such promotions mislead shoppers, particularly younger individuals and encourage habits that result in well being dangers. In response Salman Khan dismissed the grievance as baseless and said that any motion , if warranted, falls beneath the jurisdiction of Central Client Safety Authority (CCPA). His authorized staff denied the grievance and said that the commercial is for silver-coated cardamom. On December ninth he reiterated his stance and asserted that the signatures on report are genuine and constant along with his authorized paperwork. The court docket in the end handed the order over the authenticity issues of Salman Khan’s signature and ordered his signature to be inspected by a state-authorised in addition to recognised company or a Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL).The court docket additionally instructed that Salman Khan to be personally current within the court docket on the following date together with advocate R.C. Choubey, who had notarised the ability of legal professional and submitted replies on his behalf. Salman Khan introduced in his sixtieth birthday along with his household and associates and is now gearing up for his subsequent huge Eid launch Battle of Galwan, directed by Apoorva Lakhia.Disclaimer: The data on this report is predicated on a authorized listening to as reported by a third-party supply. The small print offered signify allegations made by the events concerned and usually are not confirmed info. The case is ongoing, and a last verdict has not been reached. The publication doesn’t declare that the allegations are true.