Site icon CineShout

SC refuses to intervene in Vijay’s ‘Jana Nayagan’: All it is advisable know in regards to the controversy |

SC refuses to intervene in Vijay’s ‘Jana Nayagan’: All it is advisable know in regards to the controversy |


Uncertainties loom over the discharge of Vijay’s concluding movie, ‘Jana Nayagan,’ because the Supreme Courtroom has declined to step right into a heated debate relating to its censor certification. An upcoming listening to on the Madras Excessive Courtroom on January 20 will handle the state of affairs, following a short lived maintain on a single decide’s resolution to supply a U/A certificates.

In a significant setback for Vijay starrer ‘Jana Nayagan’, the Supreme Courtroom on Thursday (January 15, 2026) refused to entertain the plea filed by the producer difficult the keep order handed by a Division Bench of the Madras Excessive Courtroom over the certification of the movie.A bench comprising Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Augustine George Masih has refused to intervene within the subject, noting that the Madras Excessive Courtroom’s Division Bench will hear the matter on January 20.

Thalapathy Vijay’s Jana Nayagan: Remake or Authentic? The Actual Story

With the censor certification row ongoing, the discharge date of ‘Jana Nayagan’ stays unsure. The movie, initially slated for launch on January 9, for the Pongal festive season, marks Vijay’s closing look on the silver display screen earlier than he shifts his focus totally to politics.Right here’s every thing it is advisable know in regards to the ‘Jana Nayagan’ censor controversy and the way it unfolded.

‘Jana Nayagan’ – Vijay’s closing on-screen look

Actor Vijay will quickly transition totally into politics, and ‘Jana Nayagan’ might be his closing on-screen look. The movie helmed by H Vinoth, therefore, has emerged as probably the most anticipated movies of the 12 months. The advance bookings proved the anticipation across the movie!

December 18: Movie submitted to CBFC

On December 18, the makers of ‘Jana Nayagan’ submitted the movie to the Central Board of Movie Certification (CBFC). Following the preliminary screening, the committee reportedly requested for a number of cuts. The makers agreed to the necessities, and as later acknowledged earlier than the Madras Excessive Courtroom, there have been round 27 cuts.

December 22: Re-submission of the movie

Primarily based on the committee’s suggestions, the makers made the adjustments and submitted the revised model of the movie to the CBFC. The CBFC’s regional workplace reportedly conveyed that the inspecting committee had advisable a U/A 16+ certificates, as per the makers. The verbal assurance, nonetheless, didn’t come by way of, and the censor certificates was not issued.

January 5: Movie referred to the revising committee

On January 5, the CBFC Chairperson referred the movie to the revising committee. The regional workplace directed the ‘Jana Nayagan’ makers to method the CBFC’s Mumbai workplace. The board later advised the court docket that the manufacturing home had been knowledgeable of this referral by way of an e mail dated January 5. When requested in regards to the delay, the CBFC acknowledged that there was “no ulterior motive” behind the referral. The referral was triggered by an inner grievance from a member of the inspecting committee. The grievance alleged that sure contents of the movie damage non secular sentiments and contained an objectionable portrayal of the armed forces.

January 6: Makers file a petition in Madras HC

With the discharge date nearing, the makers of the movie filed a petition within the Madras Excessive Courtroom on January 6, in search of the rapid issuance of the censor certificates. The producer cited that the delay may value almost Rs 500 crore, as tickets are offered.

January 7: ‘Jana Nayagan’ launch postponed

On Wednesday, in the course of the listening to, the CBFC acknowledged that the movie was referred to the revising committee after a grievance alleged that it damage the non secular sentiments of a minority neighborhood. The portrayal of armed forces additionally raised issues, and therefore was directed for additional assessment. By night, the makers of the movie introduced the postponement of ‘Jana Nayagan’. “It’s with a heavy coronary heart that we share this replace with our valued stakeholders and audiences. The discharge date of Jana Nayagan, eagerly awaited on January 9, has been postponed resulting from unavoidable circumstances past our management. We deeply perceive the anticipation, pleasure, and feelings surrounding this movie, and this resolution has not been a straightforward one for any of us. The brand new launch date might be introduced on the earliest. Till then, we humbly request your persistence and continued love. Your unwavering help is our biggest power and means every thing to the complete Jana Nayagan crew,” they stated in a press release.See Extra: ‘Jana Nayagan’ Film Launch Date Postponed Reside Updates: Supreme Courtroom refuses plea; Censor clearance nonetheless pending

January 9: Madras HC directs censor board to grant certification

On Friday, January 9, the Madras Excessive Courtroom directed the CBFC to grant a U/A certificates to ‘Jana Nayagan’. “After inspecting supplies, it’s crystal clear that the complainant’s grievance seems to be an afterthought,” Justice PT Asha, whereas saying the order, stated. The court docket additionally famous that entertaining such complaints may result in a ‘harmful development.’ Inside hours, a two-judge Bench of the Madras HC had stayed the Single Decide order to subject a U/A 16+ certificates to the movie.

January 12: Makers method the Supreme Courtroom

The movie’s producer filed an enchantment on January 12, difficult the order handed by a Division Bench of the Madras Excessive Courtroom, which placed on maintain a single decide’s directive to the Central Board of Movie Certification to subject the movie’s certificates forthwith.

What’s subsequent?

The makers of Vijay starrer ‘Jana Nayagan’ must wait until January 20. Subsequent Tuesday, the Madras Excessive Courtroom’s Division Bench will hear the matter. Disclaimer: The knowledge on this report is predicated on a authorized listening to as reported by a third-party supply. The small print supplied symbolize allegations made by the events concerned and usually are not confirmed info. The case is ongoing, and a closing verdict has not been reached. The publication doesn’t declare that the allegations are true.

Exit mobile version