7 Issues With Harry Potter And The Prisoner Of Azkaban

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban is extensively thought-about the very best film within the Harry Potter sequence, however there are numerous issues fallacious with it that simply go unnoticed. The Harry Potter e-book sequence was a worldwide phenomenon for the reason that first e-book, Harry Potter and the Thinker’s Stone, was printed in 1997.

It didn’t take lengthy for the books to be tailored to movie, with the Harry Potter film saga starting in 2001 and ending in 2011 with Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Half 2. As common and profitable as the films have been, some have been higher than others, both because of how devoted they have been to the supply materials or to their general high quality.

Though which is the very best Harry Potter film is subjective, the one extensively thought-about as the very best is the third installment within the sequence, Prisoner of Azkaban – and whereas it’s an important film and story, there are numerous issues fallacious with it, from inaccuracies to continuity errors and extra.

That Awkward Last Shot

Out of all of the issues fallacious in Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, that is one is the lesser evil, but it surely’s nonetheless one thing that viewers have identified over time as a weak spot. Prisoner of Azkaban introduces the Dementors, Sirius Black (Gary Oldman), and Remus Lupin (David Thewlis), so it’s a darker story than the earlier films.

Harry goes by means of lots in Prisoner of Azkaban – from dealing with the Dementors to studying the reality about Sirius Black –, and on the finish of the film, Black, after efficiently escaping from the Dementors, sends a brand new Firebolt broomstick to Harry. Harry rides it and Prisoner of Azkaban ends with a clumsy close-up freeze-frame of Harry’s completely satisfied face.

Whereas the concept for it’s to present Harry a hopeful ending after all the pieces he went by means of, the ending finally ends up feeling out of tone and place. There’s additionally an added impact on Harry’s face paying homage to the Dementors, which solely makes it extra awkward.

The Invisibility Cloak’s Sudden New Powers

In Harry Potter and the Thinker’s Stone, Harry acquired the Invisibility Cloak, which belonged to his father, and he had already worn it a few instances round Hogwarts. Because the title says, the Invisibility Cloak grants the wearer invisibility, however there are limitations as properly – nonetheless, these disappeared throughout Prisoner of Azkaban.

Within the film, Harry wears the cloak to go to Hogsmeade, the place he finds Malfoy, Crabbe, and Goyle messing with Ron and Hermione. Harry decides to assist his buddies by throwing snowballs at Malfoy and firm, dragging them within the snow, and extra, they usually do not know what’s occurring.

That is doable due to Harry magically not leaving any footsteps within the snow, which isn’t among the many powers of the cloak – nonetheless, when Harry enters the Three Broomsticks carrying the cloak, Ron and Hermione comply with his footsteps within the snow.

The Incomplete Story Of The Marauders

Prisoner of Azkaban can be the film that introduces the Marauders Map, given to Harry by the Weasley twins and with which Harry is ready to journey to Hogsmeade with out being seen. The viewers later learns that the Marauders have been James Potter, Black, Lupin, and Peter Pettigrew, however not as a result of it was defined in Prisoner of Azkaban.

That is largely an issue, as when Harry sees the Patronus stag on the lake, he’s satisfied it is his dad. For many who learn the e-book, this shall be clear, however not for individuals who solely watched the films.

Lots occurs in Prisoner of Azkaban, however a short rationalization of whom the Marauders have been, their connection, and the origin of the map wouldn’t have been dangerous in any respect.

Scabbers & The Marauders Map

A giant plot gap that followers of the Harry Potter saga have identified for years is all about Scabbers’ actual id and the Marauders Map. Among the many many revelations in Prisoner of Azkaban is that Ron’s pet rat, Scabbers, who had been in his household for a few years, was truly Peter Pettigrew (Timothy Spall), who betrayed Harry’s mother and father to Voldemort.

This massive reveal is hinted at early on in Prisoner of Azkaban when Harry is strolling by means of Hogwarts’ halls with the map and sees Pettigrew in it. Harry is startled by his personal reflection and sees that Pettigrew has simply walked previous him.

Now, the Weasley twins had had the map for years and used it many instances, and with Scabbers being of their home and with their brother more often than not, it raises the query of why they by no means questioned why a person named Peter Pettigrew appeared on the map with Ron on a regular basis.

Ron Weasley’s Function

Pretty much as good as Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban is, it isn’t very loyal to the characters’ portrayals within the books. Prisoner of Azkaban’s Hermione has been criticized for being too aggressive and even egocentric, however the worst modifications are, arguably, these made to Ron.

In Prisoner of Azkaban, Ron was diminished to a comic book reduction character and a cowardly however loyal pal, with some actually over-dramatic reactions all through the film to boost that comedic aspect. What’s extra painful about Prisoner of Azkaban’s portrayal of Ron is the way it diminished his intelligence, when, within the e-book, he’s extra resourceful and good.

Ron within the Prisoner of Azkaban film lacks the depth that the character has within the books and that the earlier films had given him, and it omits a few of his finest moments, resembling him standing up for Hermione in entrance of Snape and advising Harry to not search hassle after studying about Sirius’ supposed betrayal.

The Inconsistent Use Of Time Journey

One other key aspect launched in Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban is time journey, in a wizarding world manner, in fact. Hermione reveals that Professor McGonagall gave her a time-turner firstly of the college yr so she might attend all of her courses, because it allowed her to journey again in time to attend these courses she initially missed.

Hermione and Harry, with Dumbledore’s permission, use the time-turner to return in time and save Black, however there are some guidelines they need to comply with – in fact, they quickly neglect the principles, and this makes manner for a lot of inconsistencies.

The primary rule is to not let anybody see them, however simply seconds after touring again in time, they let themselves be seen by the executioner for the second time. After that, issues occur otherwise than the primary time, resembling Hermione punching Malfoy, how the vase she hits with a rock breaks, and the execution occurs otherwise, as properly.

On prime of that, neither the e-book nor the film correctly explains what occurs within the wizarding world when somebody makes use of the time-turner – are alternate timelines created? How a lot is affected sooner or later by altering one tiny factor? Fortunately, this was prevented within the subsequent films and books with the destruction of time-turners.

Harry’s Use Of Magic At The Dursleys’ Home

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban begins with Harry on the Dursleys’ home, studying beneath the blankets with the assistance of the Lumos Maxima spell, and afterward, he by chance blows up Aunt Marge out of pure rage.

The Ministry of Magic lets the latter move because it was unintentional, they usually have larger issues to take care of (this being Black’s escape), however they do nothing about Lumos Maxima. In each the books and the films, it’s firmly established that underage wizards can’t use magic outdoors Hogwarts, but Harry was utilizing Lumos Maxima not solely on the Dursleys’ however within the Muggle world, too.

Lumos Maxima is a spell distinctive to the Harry Potter films.

It’s doable that Lumos Maxima isn’t seen as an offense in using underage magic or that the Ministry was so busy with Black’s escape that Harry’s use of Lumos Maxima went unnoticed, however nonetheless, this raised many questions on the Ministry’s guidelines.