Long before he brought the world of The Walking Dead to screens, Frank Darabont was establishing himself as one of the best Stephen King adaptation directors, particularly with The Shawshank Redemption. The 1994 prison drama was Darabont’s second adaptation of a King story, preceded by his short film directorial debut with The Woman in the Room. He would go on to continue this trend with fellow prison drama The Green Mile and 2007’s The Mist, both of which are certainly excellent movies, though they still didn’t surpass The Shawshank Redemption.
Led by Tim Robbins and Morgan Freeman, the movie is based on King’s novella Rita Hayworth and Shawshank Redemption and revolves around Andy Dufresne, a banker who is given a life sentence for the murder of his wife and her lover, for which he claimed innocence. Being put in the titular prison, Andy befriends longtime inmate, Red, and gradually adjusts to his new life, also utilizing his financial skills for a money laundering scheme led by the warden. As the operation grows bigger and the warden more greedy, Andy begins reflecting on his situation and contemplating an escape.
The Shawshank Redemption Doesn’t Need A Catalyst To Keep Us Invested
A Grounded, Decades-Spanning Story & Compelling Characters Are All That’s Needed
While not quite a slice-of-life movie, The Shawshank Redemption‘s story is a fascinating one because it doesn’t really have any catalysts beyond Andy’s arrest and imprisonment. It simply follows him as he becomes accustomed to his new home in the titular prison. That’s not to say nothing happens as the movie progresses, as Andy’s early days in prison are fraught with danger in dealing with the abusive guards and being targeted for assault by a gang known as “the Sisters”.
Rather than compress the 128-page novella into a streamlined film, Darabont properly allows the characters and story time to breathe with its 142-minute runtime.
Rather than make just one of these the focus of the film, Darabont smartly makes The Shawshank Redemption into a multi-decade story about Andy’s life in prison, of which “the Sisters” and the guards are only a small part. While much of this credit could be given to King, as the novella also chronicles about 30 years of Andy’s prison sentence, the fact that Darabont stayed faithful to the source material is why the movie works. Rather than compress the 128-page novella into a streamlined film, Darabont properly allows the characters and story time to breathe with its 142-minute runtime.
The characters are also one of the biggest reasons why the film is so compelling. Darabont’s script really allows many of the inmate characters to be sympathetic and lovable beyond just Andy and Red, even if their backstories are not as fleshed out. Darabont also nicely keeps the villainous characters grounded rather than cartoonish, which makes them all the more terrifying in the various ways they torment Andy during his prison tenure.
Robbins & Freeman Deliver Awe-Inspiring Performances
James Whitmore Is Also Quietly The Best Supporting Player In The Film
The role of Shawshank Redemption‘s Andy was one that notably saw a wide range of actors considered by Darabont, with everyone from Gene Hackman to Clint Eastwood, Tom Cruise, Tom Hanks and Nicolas Cage all approached and declining for various reasons. Thankfully for us, Darabont turned to Robbins to bring the movie’s protagonist to life, moved by his performance in the criminally underrated Jacob’s Ladder, and it proved to be the perfect casting. Robbins expertly captures the quietly thoughtful nature of Andy, with every devastating situation all the more impactful thanks to his performance.
While Robbins and Freeman are certainly the stars of the show, there’s no denying that James Whitmore is the best supporting player in The Shawshank Redemption‘s cast.
Freeman’s casting similarly proves to be an exemplary choice for Red, not only for his charming persona, but also for tackling the character’s baseline cynicism about life. This is no more evident than in Red’s multiple parole hearings throughout the film, subtly showing his growing disinterest in trying to convince them to let him out of prison. The final hearing that actually results in his release further exemplifies the quiet power Freeman brought to the part, showcasing Red’s growth in finally allowing himself to fully let his guard down and be vulnerable about the crime that got him imprisoned.
While Robbins and Freeman are certainly the stars of the show, there’s no denying that James Whitmore is the best supporting player in The Shawshank Redemption‘s cast as the prison librarian Brooks. Starting as the kind and eccentric older prisoner, Brooks becomes a key figure in the movie’s exploration of the impact longtime imprisonment can have on someone. His struggle to readjust to life on the outside and his subsequent suicide because of it are all the more heartbreaking thanks to Whitmore’s compelling performance.
Hope Is At The Center Of Shawshank Redemption’s Story
The Few Changes Darabont Makes To King’s novella Expertly Spotlight This Theme
The Shawshank Redemption remains such a poignant and emotional movie to watch 30 years later thanks to the way it explores the importance of maintaining hope even in the bleakest of situations. From Andy’s first night in prison, in which the inmates torment other new prisoners, to Brooks’ struggles in the real world, we really see the characters pushed to their breaking point for wanting to give up on life.
I hope filmmakers continue to learn from Darabont’s example when bringing the author’s stories to life.
But where Brooks’ death is heartbreaking, it’s actually meaningful in how both Red and Andy’s stories conclude in The Shawshank Redemption. Rather than allow himself to remain under the warden’s thumb, Andy successfully outsmarts him and escapes. Red, pushed to the emotional brink in the same way Brooks was in trying to readapt to normal life, also elects to take Andy’s invitation to join him in Mexico, choosing to embrace hope to reunite with his friend.
Interestingly, this is also one of the few parts of the story where Darabont deviates from King’s novella, and yet it works in the film’s favor, as the source material doesn’t depict their reunion. Darabont even did a similar thing with The Mist, though he ended the movie on a more dour note than the book, in which King has since expressed feeling better than his. Even if his subsequent King adaptations never quite topped the majesty that is The Shawshank Redemption, I hope filmmakers continue to learn from Darabont’s example when bringing the author’s stories to life.